Sadly, it is so true.
You wouldn't think we are a country at war, especially if you tuned in to our news.
We have days of unimportant coverage on Lindsay Lohan, a mis-behaving movie "star" who is surely some role model we should pay attention to. Note: the previous sentence was to be read with a laaaarge dose of sarcasm.
But it isn't just her. It is also stories on car chases, celebrity break-ups, weight loss secrets or whatever other nonsense that is somehow qualifying as "news" in today's society.
You wouldn't think we are a country at war.
Do you remember the last time you watched a report on the War on Terror? Or at least one that was longer than a 30-second sound-bite? Generally no.
A recent exception would be the General McChrystal/Rolling Stone uproar which the media was diligent in covering, probably because it seemed more like the hot-headed Hollywood behavior that they're used to.
You wouldn't think we are a country at war.
We need coverage of it, namely of the men and women we're losing in it... on both sides.
Back in September of 2006, CBS ran a story where the lead line read: Now the death toll is 9/11 times two.
Did you see the date? That wasn't a typo: 2006!?! Nearly four years ago we had already doubled 2,973 which, according to that same article, was the total number of victims in New York,Washington and Pennsylvania in case you couldn't remember that number.
Other than around the month of September, particularly the 11th, it seems that our country doesn't remember that number or that incident. We're too busy soaking up the celebrity garbage that is taking over our news.
You wouldn't think we are a country at war.
And with as little coverage as the war gets, we don't even have a clear idea of the NUMBERS, whether we would choose to forget those or not.
The problem is, when I went searching for the death toll, it was hard to find, at least accurately. There is so much word play on this "War on Terror/Overseas Contingency Operation" that a ton of different numbers came up. For example, some of the rhetorical re-wordings included "violent" deaths, "attack" deaths, "in combat" deaths, "civilian" deaths, "contractor" deaths, etc. etc. etc.
You know what it boils down to? A whole lot of DEATH.
According to antiwar.com (forgive me for the obviously biased source), here is the most comprehensive list of numbers I could find:
Casualties in Iraq | ||
American Military Casualties in Iraq | ||
Date | Total | In Combat |
American Deaths | ||
Since war began (3/19/03): | 4413 | 3491 |
Since "Mission Accomplished" (5/1/03) (the list) | ||
Since Capture of Saddam (12/13/03): | 3952 | 3185 |
Since Handover (6/29/04): | 3554 | 2858 |
Since Obama Inauguration (1/20/09): | 185 | 87 |
American Wounded | Official | |
Total Wounded: | 31888 | Over 100000 |
Latest Fatality July 21, 2010 | ||
Well done, wonderful woman! God bless you. . .Keep thinking and keep speaking, passionately, COMpassionately, and rationally. Proud to know you.
ReplyDelete